Internal Audit · QAIP

A record, not a score.

Run your Quality Assurance and Improvement Programme continuously. AI assembles the evidence for the period and cites it — your team confirms every rating, and the system records both.

GIAS-aligned · AI-native · English & Arabic · In-region hosting

Book a Demo

Built For

Chief Audit Executive

Head of Internal Audit

Audit Committee Chair

The Quality Assurance and Improvement Programme (QAIP) evidences that your internal audit function conforms to the Standards — assessed for the period, held as one governed record.

The Problem

A QAIP proves your function conforms. Most are run once a year, by hand, against last year's memory.

Framework Coverage

GIAS 2024

UK Internal Audit Code

IIA Standards · EQA

What you get

Saves time

A multi-day manual exercise becomes review-and-confirm. The evidence is assembled and cited before you open the assessment.

Reduces risk

Every rating links to dated evidence and a named human decision. Nothing is carried forward unassessed. Defensible under scrutiny.

Levels up quality

EQA-grade methodology in the product itself — mandatory rationale, evidence lifecycle, immutable trail. Ready for your external assessor.

What it does

Assessed for the period

The AI reads only evidence dated inside your review window — and cites it. No history laundered into this cycle's judgement.

AI proposes, you confirm

Every suggested rating is a proposal. Your assessor accepts, overrides or dismisses it. The AI never sets a final rating.

Nothing black-box

Each rating links to evidence with a lifecycle; N/A demands documented rationale. No scores appear from nowhere.

One immutable record

The suggestion, the human decision and the timestamp of both — on an audit trail your board and external assessor can read.

The AI Principle

AI proposes. You confirm.
The record holds both.

Competitors offer a score. SustainGRC offers a record — every judgement, its evidence, and who made it. That is the difference an external quality assessor is trained to look for.

AI assembles & cites

→

Assessor judges

→

System records both

How it connects

Reads engagements and findings from Audit Management, and pushes improvement actions to Issues & Actions as governed CAPs.

Audit ManagementIssues & ActionsERMAI GovernanceQAIPBoard Reporting

Frequently Asked
Questions

Does the AI decide our conformance ratings?

No. The AI assembles and cites the evidence for the review period and proposes a rating. Your assessor confirms every one. The AI never sets a final rating, and the record shows both the proposal and the human decision.

How does it assess for the period, not history?

Suggestions are drawn only from evidence dated inside the review window, and cite it. Where none exists, the AI proposes nothing and routes to your assessor. No rating is ever carried forward from a prior cycle.

Which frameworks does it support?

The IIA Global Internal Audit Standards 2024 and the UK Internal Audit Code of Practice. Framework is fixed once per assessment; the two are never compared across a single record.

Is the record ready for external quality assessment?

Yes. Every rating links to dated evidence and a named human decision on an immutable, append-only trail. It is an input your external assessor reviews — never a substitute for their independent judgement.

How is this different from a spreadsheet self-assessment?

A spreadsheet holds a score. SustainGRC holds a record — every judgement, its evidence and its author — continuously maintained and ready for the board and the external quality assessment.

Diligence that does not age.

See the QAIP that assembles the evidence, records the judgement, and holds up under review.

Book a Demo

What you get