BOARD EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION
Reviewed every year. Improved rarely.
Board evaluations produce polite reports and forgettable actions. Run candid, anonymised reviews that surface what directors really think — and convert findings into commitments the board is held to.
Built For
"Board Effectiveness Evaluation is the structured, code-aligned review of how well a board and its committees function — candid input, synthesised themes, and actions tracked to closure."
THE RITUAL
The Code asks for an annual evaluation. It does not ask for a better board. Most reviews satisfy the first and quietly ignore the second.
Framework coverage
What It Does
Candid, anonymised input
Director-by-director surveys with identity separated from response at the data layer — so people say what they actually think, across board, committee and Chair dimensions.
Synthesise the themes
The agent clusters free-text responses into anonymised themes. No attribution to a name, no rating of a person, no board score.
Findings to commitments
Every theme converts to a named action with an owner and a date. The review ends with a plan the board owns — not a PDF that's filed and forgotten.
Track to closure
Actions carry forward and are reported at the next cycle. An immutable record of what was found, what was agreed, and what was done.
WHY IT'S DIFFERENT
A board is not a number.
We don't grade directors or rank your board. We produce a candid, anonymised record of collective effectiveness — and the tracked commitments that follow. The artefact a regulator, an investor and a nominations committee can all trust.
Built as One
40+ modules on one canonical data model. Not 10 acquisitions stitched together. Enter once, serve everywhere.
Data Integrity by Design
Financial-grade validation from source to report. Anomaly detection, multi-source reconciliation, complete audit trails.
Connected Intelligence
Material topics feed risk registers. Carbon data populates disclosures. Regulatory changes propagate platform-wide.
THE AGENT
Synthesis without attribution.
The Evaluation Agent clusters candid free-text responses into themes and proposes recommended actions — never linking a comment to a name, never producing a score. The Chair confirms; the system records.
Propose
Agent clusters anonymised responses into themes and drafts recommended actions.
Confirm
The Chair reviews, amends or rejects each theme and action. Judgement stays human.
Record
Themes and agreed actions are written to an immutable, code-aligned record.
HOW IT CONNECTS
Reads the board and committee structure from Board Governance, and pushes every agreed action to Issues & Actions — tracked to closure and reported at the next cycle.
See Board Governance